Estimated reading time 5 minutes, 20 seconds.
California-based eVTOL developer Wisk Aero and U.K. infrastructure company Skyports have teamed up to look at how vertiports and other ground infrastructure need to be designed to support future autonomous eVTOL operations.
The companies released a concept of operations (CONOPS) today that paints a picture of how autonomous advanced air mobility (AAM) infrastructure operations may look.
Wisk and Skyports said AAM companies generally “recognize that autonomy is the key to unlocking the scalability, accessibility, and affordability needed to realize the full potential and total addressable market of AAM.”
Aerospace companies such as Airbus and its CityAirbus NextGen are actively designing its piloted eVTOL to be able to transition to autonomy later on. And on the other side of the world, China-based EHang has plans to launch autonomous passenger services later this year, after its EH216 is type-certified by Chinese aviation authorities.
With plans to go straight to market with autonomous operations, Gary Gysin, CEO of Wisk, said its CONOPs with Skyports helps define “future operations while ensuring the long-term success and full potential of this industry.”
The companies call the document the first of its kind in North America, which looks beyond building vertiports for piloted air taxi services and considers what needs to be integrated to support future autonomous operations.
“It’s important that infrastructure built today can accommodate the aircraft of tomorrow,” said Duncan Walker, CEO of Skyports. “The CONOPs and our continued work on the development of vehicle-agnostic vertiports and ground-based infrastructure will ensure that this industry is well prepared to safely integrate autonomous operations in the future.”
with four cars and four drivers needed for each return journey and two aircraft with two pilots the economics and logistics are hopeless . “Full autonomy” for road vehicles is proving near impossible (Uber drivers get a reprieve) and unmanned flight has not been proven for EVTOL in turbulent conditions at large scale (the wake of a “Skyport” will create it’s own gustiness on approach – from downwind ) How many more ‘stab in the dark” iterations will it need ? Heaviside? Wisk? Aurora? –Archer and Joby likewise –cash burners without coherent design ideas.
So before we even get a chance to fly you intend to take away that right? I think evtols will be far safer then automobiles ever will be. Of course there will be automated systems, flight control, destination controls, but take away our right to fly? Tragic. I for one will be fighting for the freedom of flight, it’s not just getting from point a to point b.
e/hXSTOL PAVs will prove to be the type of aircraft and economic catalyst that will allow AAM to succeed.
Leave a comment